13.95 m. Height: 4.73 m. 4.74 m. Mikoyan MiG-29 Sukhoi Su-57 Length Width Height 0 5 10 15 20. Mikoyan MiG-29. Sukhoi Su-57. Length. 17.37.
Size Comparison. CATEGORY. F-35 LIGHTNING 2. MIRAGE 2000E. Length. 15.6 m – 50.0 ft. 14.36 m – 47 ft 1 in. Wingspan. 10.7 m – 35 ft 0 in. It is cost-effective. The F-16’s low maintenance costs and efficient design make it an ideal choice for governments looking to get the most bang for their buck. In conclusion, the Sukhoi Su-27 and General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon are robust and reliable fighter jets with many advantages.
The Su-75 is a very, very promising machine in terms of mass production. However, the MiG-35 has a key advantage – it is already in the series and has been adopted by the industry, which can play a key role. There is still no unequivocal opinion about the Su-75 since none of the prototypes has yet flown.
The MiG 29 is due to be replaced by the new Su-57 fighter jet in the 2020s, while the Eurofighter Typhoon is still in service and is expected to remain in service until at least 2030. Eurofighter Typhoon vs MiG 29 comparison conclusion. The Eurofighter Typhoon and the MiG 29 are both capable fighter jets, but they have several differences.

3. In dogfight probably Su-27 is winner, but in Beyond Visual Range fighet Gripen should have adventage. It has better radar and technology, and also new versions use MBDA Meteor that is best Air-to-Air missile for maneuverable targets, lot better than American AIM-120 AMRAAM or Russian R77 Vympel. Also for medium range Gripen use MBDA MICA

imNqb. 173 123 88 67 301 329 200 84 18

mig 29 vs su 35 size comparison